Re: Installation Report for powerpc-apple-netbsdelf1.5
От | Henry B. Hotz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Installation Report for powerpc-apple-netbsdelf1.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | v0421013eb5b492dcd2e8@[137.78.84.130] обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Installation Report for powerpc-apple-netbsdelf1.5 (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 2:20 AM +0000 8/5/00, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > I think what you're supposed to do in NetBSD is what was said earlier > > (-Wl,-R/usr/whatever/lib). Sounds like that conflicts with a lot of > > people's beliefs about how to do it on a lot of other platforms > > though. It also breaks the "try the regression tests before > > installing" feature. > >Not necessarily, since you can override the rpath setting with >LD_LIBRARY_PATH (at least on Linux and presumably other gnu-capable >systems). Ah, I found it! It's LD_RUN_PATH on this platform (NetBSD/macppc). At least we do have the (backward IMHO) Solaris-style workaround. NetBSD/mac68k is still using xcoff so they have a /etc/ld.so.conf file. That works much better for this situation. FWIW the Linux crowd (MkLinux and LinuxPPC) are also using SysV/ELF binaries while AIX/Darwin/MacOS X are using xcoff. I'm really not sure that ELF is the step forward it's cracked up to be. I guess the Linux folks are no happier with the situation. It would appear that the correct thing to do for NetBSD/ELF is the -W-R stuff and then set LD_RUN_PATH for the preinstall regression tests. Sorry if that makes the configure setup more complex. Signature held pending an ISO 9000 compliant signature design and approval process. h.b.hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: